Call Email Join Donate
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

“Learnt Sexism”, London School of Economics, discrimination against men, and more evidence of feminist brainwashing

November 12, 2011
By
discrimination against men

Tom Martin interviews UK students about "Learnt Sexism" and discrimination against men. Click on the picture to watch the video.

Hi NCFM!
Press release:

Friday, November 4th, 2011:

UK student activist Tom Martin interviews clueless university students about “Learnt Sexism” and discrimination against men.

Tom Martin, the man suing the London School of Economics (LSE) for discrimination against men in one of its gender studies Masters degrees, appears in a new video asking LSE students if they think discrimination against men in a curriculum is justifiable, as the university’s defense team have argued.

Some students get aggressive, telling Tom that discrimination against men in a curriculum is indeed justifiable, as ‘… men don’t face any discrimination’. Those who claim to have read gender studies or feminist literature appear to be the most ignorant, aggressive and oppressive on gender politics – opposing men’s issues debates outright. Tom says “Elite students should be aware, that to espouse such bias and man-hatred is completely wrong – but a lot of the students I spoke to don’t seem to have an internal alarm bell. They just blurt it out. We have all learned to recognize and reject misogyny, now its time the educational establishment accept, and teach, that misandry is completely unacceptable too.”

discrimination against men

At least two of these female students believe there is no discrimination against men. One is abusive and demonstrates the inability of ideologues to think past their indoctrination.

The case still awaits an initial trial date, and Tom asks all those interested in supporting equality for men in education to donate to the fighting fund at http://sexismbusters.org/ – 49 men and women from six countries have done so, the total currently standing at ÂŁ1375, with a further ÂŁ900 needed for further vital legal fees in preparation for the initial court hearing.

Tom also asks people to like, follow or subscribe on Youtube,
Twitter and Facebook- and do anything else they can to keep spreading the word.

For media and all other inquires, contact Tom Martin through sexismbusters@hotmail.com

NCFM NOTE: Also see: http://ncfm.org/2011/05/issues/education/

Please support Mr. Martin in his valiant effort to stop discrimination against men.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Learnt Sexism”, London School of Economics, discrimination against men, and more evidence of feminist brainwashing

  1. Fred Hayward on November 24, 2011 at 10:40 AM

    "discrimination against men in a curriculum is indeed justifiable, as ‘… men don’t face any discrimination’." It's amazing that they can argue for something which is an inherent contradiction. They are saying that something is okay because it doesn't exist. But, if it doesn't exist, how can it be okay? If someone asked you if you are comfortable with penguins ruling the world, would you say "Yes," or would you say, "What the hell are you talking about?!? Penguins don't rule the world."

    Their illogic me a little of anti-Semites who deny the Holocaust — but support another one.

  2. Fred Hayward on November 24, 2011 at 10:32 AM

    It's really hard for me to believe that Yolanda is serious and not engaging in sarcastic humor. Can someone REALLY be that stupid, ignorant, and lacking in self-awareness? For someone who claims that "there is no such thing as sexism against men," she sure does a good job of perfectly embodying it.

  3. Marc on November 24, 2011 at 1:38 AM

    Yoland, you sound like a perfect example of sexism against men. You blame men for everything bad but you would call it sexist to priase men for good things like science, medicine, etc. You would say women did contribute, and they were not allowed to. The same for war, isn't it? Women leaders have declared and supported wars, and women have supported wars at almost the same rate men have. 76% of women and 86% of men supported the U.S. Gulf War invasion. http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-19/news/mn-17… Women have actively encouraged military adventurism, both in modern and indigenous societies, and that in the face of imminent conflict, women goad their men into combat.

    You benefit off of men's blood, sweat and tears and all you do is put them down. You drive on roads paved by their blood. You occupy buildings build by their low wage labor. They're fixing your roads, cleaning your sewers, picking up your garbage, and all you can do is put them down. You're nothing but a piece of shit.

  4. CyclotronMajesty on November 17, 2011 at 3:06 PM

    I think it's integral to being female. To have the power of the victim and weakness.
    I don't even think they are indoctrinated, they are just hungry for power and control.

  5. Marc on November 14, 2011 at 1:34 PM

    Thank you Tom!

Leave a Reply to Fred Hayward Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.