NCFM Secretary Al Rava letter to the editor published in California’s Daily Journal re “Top 100 Lawyers” list

December 14, 2011
By
lawyer

It is because I say it is! Understand?

Patricia Sturdevant, President and Naomi Dewey, District 6 Governor on behalf of California Women Lawyers, recently complained to the Daily Journal about “gender bias inherent in yet another of the Daily Journal‘s publications” (Letters to the Editor: “Top lawyers list is gender biased,” Nov. 28.).

Sturdevant and Dewey were upset that the Daily Journal’s 2011 list of the California’s “Top 100 Lawyers” included only 18 women. These two women only organization operatives thought that since women are 31 percent of lawyers nationwide and predominate in many law school classes, then, women deserved more than 18 slots on the Top 100 Lawyers list regardless of competence or other qualifying factors, which represents typical feminist jurisprudence thinking, “I’m a woman, I want it, I should have it, nothing else matters, it’s your fault because you have a penis and don’t share”.

So, it appears that on behalf of all women lawyers across America these two women only barristers “implored “the Daily Journal  to “make drastic changes in the way (the Daily Journal) editorialize on top lawyers and to commit to working toward gender equality in your textual and pictorial coverage.”  Please remember these women represent a women only organization, an organization that openly discriminates against men, yet they bemoan perceived discrimination for no other reason than they are women. Huh? Do you get it yet? Does this convoluted thinking make any sense to you? It is this type of narrsistic lack of reasoning that now shapes our laws. Insanity.

They conclude, “If the Daily Journal is to survive in an increasingly competitive world, it must reflect the community it serves. This isn’t just politics, its business. We call on the Daily Journal Corp. to take immediate steps to ensure that the nomination processes for awards and honors, including the “Top 100 Lawyers,” produces accurate, relevant and representative results. To do otherwise is to cheat your readers and your shareholders of the opportunity to share in the great legal news stories that women across this state generate every day”.

Get it! Or, are you still thinking through it? They offer no facts, put forth no names of deserving women lawyers, and offer no evidence that those on the Top 100 List don’t deserve to belong there penis or no penis. They simply believe something to be true so it must be regardless of facts in evidence. To reiterate, it’s that brain dead kind ‘a thinking driving decisions shaping our country and world. Absolutely terrifying.

In their gender discriminatory wisdom the Daily Journal printed a response by Mr. Al Rava, Esq. and Secretary of the National Coalition For Men entitled, Scrape the Top 100 Lawyers’ Contest.

Mr. Rava said in part,

“As a male attorney and Secretary of the National Coalition for Men, I write to ask why the California Women Lawyers apparently never complained about The Journal‘s “Top Women Lawyers” list, which obviously excludes California’s male lawyers – based solely on gender, and which does not have a “Top Men Lawyers” counterpart?

I agree the “Top 100 Lawyers” should include more than 18 women attorneys if the additional women honorees are indeed deserving. Perhaps it is time for the Daily Journal to scrap its archaic “Top Women Lawyers” contest and devote more time to evaluating and equating women attorneys on the same level as men attorneys. Besides, certain types of traditional sex discrimination that may appear to benefit women, such as awards for only women attorneys, scientists, or soldiers, are, as Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 684 (1973), “rationalized by an attitude of ‘romantic paternalism’ which, in practical effect, put women, not on a pedestal, but in a cage.”

I’m not sure I agree with Justice Brennan but hypocrisy screams from the irrational bully pulpit of Sturdevant and Dewey. To reiterate, they represent an all women organization and mention nothing about the Daily Journal’s Top Women Lawyers contest, but bemoan and demand reform to the gender inclusive Top 100 Lawyer list because only 18 slots were filled by women. Do you get it yet? Can you hear the senselessness of the I want so I deserve rather than I earn so I should be recognized?

Fe-Me-ism for non thinkers, listen carefully and you’ll hear it…

NOTE: The Daily Journal is California’s leading legal newspaper provider. No links are provided to the above articles since the Daily Journal is subscriber based and unavailable to non subscribers.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Orkut
  • Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses to NCFM Secretary Al Rava letter to the editor published in California’s Daily Journal re “Top 100 Lawyers” list

  1. Drew Baas on December 14, 2011 at 2:16 PM

    In the U.S. in 2011 there are 1,682 abuse shelters for women, 5,000+ abuse shelters for animals, and 0 abuse shelters for men. N.D.V. Hotline, N.C.A.D.V., and A.S.P.C.A.
    In the entire U.S. there is only one DV shelter that serves men also.

    Good men, and women have dedicated their lives to create places that can help stop this epidemic. So, when I am asked again "Where have all the good men gone'" I don't have to point to a grave yard…

    If all of my FB friends gave $20 we could provide a home, food, employment, and love for 5 people.. If my FB friends gave $100 we could build a village to save 75 people per unit. NOT per day,but for a lifetime! As, we are disallowed by law to receive federal, and state funds, what we do is all on our own. Scratched from the earth, and built by our own hands. http://avillageformen.net/

  2. DrewBaas on December 14, 2011 at 2:13 PM
    • Harry on December 14, 2011 at 3:14 PM

      Great idea. Good luck with this Drew.

  3. Marc on December 14, 2011 at 12:21 PM

    Thank you, Al!

  4. Kratch on December 14, 2011 at 12:19 PM

    "NOTE: The Daily Journal is California’s leading legal newspaper provider. No links are provided to the above articles since the Daily"

    Was this an incomplete sentence? Since the daily ….

    I'm assuming you meant to say it's a paid subscription paper, based on their registry page?

  5. Ray2447 on December 14, 2011 at 11:59 AM

    Did The Daily Journal forget to show special privileged, pampering treatment to low performing female lawyers? :-/ How un-chivalrous of them! How dare The Daily Journal think that just because female lawyers are liberated and "can do anything better than a man," that they are not entitled to special rights (unequal treatment) under journalism and under law.

    The overt sexist prejudice (against women and men), and hypocrisy, in such addled thinking as that shown by "California Women's Lawyers" stinks to high heaven, in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

See NCFM Wayback

waybackmachineOver the years millions of people worldwide have visited a National Coalition For Men website. Also over the years the site has changed dramatically, been taken down, moved, and otherwise uprooted. In those processes much information was lost, not recovered, and does not appear on this site. However you can see earlier versions and many of the extraordinary accomplishments of NCFM back to 1996 by using the WayBackMachine. In the search box type www.ncfm.org

One of the best resources on the Internet for falsely accused college students and their families

ncfm carolinas

Bookmark this site if you are a college student or parent who cares about the children regardless of their age…

a voice for male students

paternity fraud naomi evans meme

Are Things Really Equal?

Girlwriteswhat on ideological feminism and its impact on our society and culture

campus hate speech

More on the war against males in education

sexual harassment on campus

sexual harassment DOE

This explains why our politicians do stupid things about domestic violence

The Richard Fine Saga and Family Court Cartel

Interview with Erin Pizzey, the women who started the domestic violence shelter movement

Click on the picture below for Erin’s website

realsexism.com

sexism

Other MUST WATCH Videos

 

Great Resources for Abused Men

 
  • Dometic Abuse Hotline for Men and Women, based in Maine, offers 24-hour hotline: 1-888-7HELPLINE (1-888-743-5754) and may be offering shelter services.
  • Valley Oasis in Lancater, CA has offers shelter and other services for men and their children. 24-hour Hotline: (661) 945-6736.
  • Family of Men Support Society, Calgary, Canada, shelter and support services.
  • Male Survivor, Overcoming Sexual Victimization of Boys and Men
  • probono.net, provides resources for pro bono and legal services attorneys and others working to assist low income or disadvantaged clients.
  • LawHelp.org, helps low and moderate income people find free legal aid programs in their communities, answers to questions about their legal rights, and find forms to help with their legal problems.
  • Shared Parenting Works has parenting plans and other resources.
  • Walk a Mile in HIS Shoes resources for abused men in Canada.
  • One in Three Campaign resoures for abused men in Australia.
  • Stop Abuse for Everyone, one of the most comprehensive and oldest sites dedicated to victims of domestic violence. The site was recently upgraded with the assistance of NCFM. The site includes an interactive map of north America for helping to find shelter services that might or do help abused men.

More great resources for men and those who care about men. Ask your elected officials if they do.

Men's Health Network

Protect yourself! Get the book!!

RSS AVoiceforMen.com

File a Federal Complaint

If you have specific instances of discrimination against male domestic violence victims by any government-funded DV program anywhere in the U.S., please send all evidence you have to the following federal agencies as a complaint, and state that this violates United States Code, Title 42, Section 3789d(c)(1). Give them as much evidence as you can. They are supposed to investigate it. After several months you may get a letter back saying there is "insufficient evidence" and that they need more information such as dates and times of the discrimination, names of the programs and contact info, names and contact info of witnesses, documents or records, and a detailed chronological narrative. So, re regarding evidence, the more the better. You can send the complaints by email, mail, or both. Send them to: Office of Civil Rights Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice 810 7th Street, NW Washington, DV 20531 Office of the Inspector General inspector.general@usdoj.gov oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

%d bloggers like this: