NCFM Plays Pivital Civil Rights Roll California in Courts Repeatedly Ruling that Women-Only Gyms Illegal

April 11, 2011

Except for Family Court, at least in California the Courts know what "discrimination based on sex" means. And, it's illegal!

In the most recent case of a California Court finding that women-only gyms are illegal, On March 18, 2011, in the Superior Court for Solano County, Judge Ramona J. Garrett, who happens to be a woman, ruled a women-only health club violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (Lady of America Trial Court Decision).  The Unruh Act, passed in 1959, but derived from California’s 1897 codification of the state’s common law doctrines of equal treatment, provides all consumers “no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, marital status, or sexual orientation” are entitled to equal “accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments.”

Champions of equal rights for men and women, such as the National Coalition For Men and its members, have long used California’s Unruh Act in administrative agency and civil court actions to support of California’s strong public policy to eradicate sex discrimination.  This includes NCFM Secretary and attorney Al Rava assisting in the representation of women in a class action against a chain of hair salons for charging women more than men for haircuts, no matter the length or style of the client’s hair. ( Order For Final Approval of Master Cuts Settlement.)   The hair salon chain agreed to charge customers the same price for the same type of haircut, and settle the class action for an amount not to exceed $1.75 million.

Many NCFM members have used the Unruh Act to successfully sue California businesses that charged men more than women for food, drinks, car washes, billiards, bowling, golf, target practice, skateboarding, skiing, bicycling events, airline travel, concerts, and nightclub cover charges.  NCFM members also often work with state agencies and officials, such as the ABC or attorneys general, to stop many sex-based marketing promotions such as Ladies’ Day or Ladies’ Night events that treat male and female patrons unequally.

Regarding health clubs that treat male and female members unequally, Mr. Rava represented a class of men who sued a California chain of fifteen fitness centers with women-only exercise areas in their fourteen otherwise coed gyms and with one women-only gym, for violating the Unruh Act by charging men the same monthly dues as female members, but the men received lesser accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services than did the female members. The fitness chain agreed to open its formerly women-only exercise areas, equipment, and gym to all members, no matter their sex, in a settlement valued at $5 million for the class of male members.  ( Final Approval Order and Judgment Family Fitness)

This follows a judgment obtained a few years earlier by NCFM member Phillip Kottle through California’s Department of Fair Employment & Housing (“DFEH”), the State agency charged with preventing discrimination in places of public accommodation, against a Santa Rosa women-only health club for violating the Unruh Act  (DFEH and Phillip Kottle v. Body Central Judgment in Sonoma County Superior Court). The DFEH also negotiated a settlement agreement with a Gold’s Gym to open its women-only exercise area and equipment to men ( Gold’s Gym Settlement with DFEH).

When asked about otherwise coed health clubs with exclusively women-only exercise areas and equipment, NCFM President Harry Crouch said, “It’s morally and legally wrong to charge everyone the same price for something, but then give one group of people less than what they paid for, based on their sex.  But that’s exactly what’s happening with these women-only workout areas and equipment.  Men and women pay the same price for their memberships, but one group is given inferior access to the exercise areas and equipment.”

In the recent Solano County Superior Court action, judge Ramona Garrett was asked to rule on a dispute concerning a lease agreement between a Lady of America women-only fitness center franchisee and its landlord.  The franchisee, after entering into a franchise agreement with the Lady of America franchisor, and signing a lease agreement with the landlord, learned single-sex health clubs were unlawful in California because they violated California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act, codified as Civil Code section 51.

Neither the franchisee nor the landlord knew such single-sex health clubs violated California law at the time the parties entered into the lease agreement.  Therefore, because the franchisee could not lawfully operate a single-sex gym in California, it closed and stopped paying rent, with several years left on its lease.

Judge Garrett rescinded or canceled the lease on the basis of mutual mistake of law by both parties when they entered into the lease, because they mistakenly understood the operation of the franchisee’s leased premises was not illegal.  The judge found that “at the time the lease was entered into, the operation of a single-sex fitness facility was discriminatory, and therefore a violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act.  Moreover, it was and is legally impossible and impracticable for [the franchisee’s] facility to comply with the Unruh Civil Rights Act and provide equal membership privileges, benefits, and accommodations to men.”

California law is clear: Single-sex health clubs and coed health clubs with  exercise areas or equipment set aside for the exclusive use of men or women violate the State’s equal accommodations laws, just like areas or equipment set aside for the exclusive use of a group based on race, religion, or sexual orientation would violate the same laws.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Orkut
  • Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

One Response to NCFM Plays Pivital Civil Rights Roll California in Courts Repeatedly Ruling that Women-Only Gyms Illegal

  1. Mary Anne on April 11, 2011 at 5:06 AM

    This makes perfect sense to me. I'd be upset if California allowed men-only country clubs or men-only exercise areas and equipment at my crowded coed gym. As would other groups over a Caucasian-only country club, gym, or exercise areas or equipment at an otherwise integrated gym.

Leave a Reply

national coalition for men
donate now blue

See NCFM Wayback

waybackmachineOver the years millions of people worldwide have visited a National Coalition For Men website. Also over the years the site has changed dramatically, been taken down, moved, and otherwise uprooted. In those processes much information was lost, not recovered, and does not appear on this site. However you can see earlier versions and many of the extraordinary accomplishments of NCFM back to 1996 by using the WayBackMachine. In the search box type

Are Things Really Equal?




“The Red Pill” documentary extended sneak preview

Save Our Heroes

Honorable Men

The New Warrior community is a group of men who specially pride themselves on being honorable. Tim Goldich, President NCFM Chicago Chapter and author of, Loving Men, Respecting Women: The Future of Gender Politics joined that community several years ago. He came to realize just how vulnerable honorable men are to having their honor used against them. Our fate may indeed depend upon honorable conduct. To better understand how the misuse of Man’s honor is a root cause of issues and ideas found on this website you should first read Mr. Goldich’s article, The Honorable Man. It lights the way to understanding how The Honorable Man can be manipulated into becoming The Complacent Man.

Rape Hysteria by Students, Part 3 – Misandry in Education

From Women’s Rights to Feminist Wrongs: Society’s Contemporary Contempt for Men

Men’s Issues

Military corruption

NCFM Adviser Philip W. Cook with “Girl Writes What” NCFM Member Karen Straughan

Girlwriteswhat on ideological feminism and its impact on our society and culture

Campus Hate Speech: Warren Farrell protest at University of Toronto

Foundation for Male Studies Conference: Looking Forward to Solutions Part 1

Foundation for Male Studies Conference: Looking Forward to Solutions Part 2

Please donate to the Foundation for Male Studies. There may be nothing more important for our future than to assure the fair, equitable, and high quality education of our boys and men.

More on the war against males in education

Great site for facts and relevant articles

center for prosecutorial integrety


Erin Pizzey’s website

More MUST WATCH Videos

Male Victims of Domestic Violence – The Hidden Story

Dr. Helen

Protect yourself! Get the book!

Great Resources for Abused Men

  • Valley Oasis in Lancater, CA offers shelter and other services for men, women, and their children. 24-hour Hotline: (661) 945-6736.
  • Male Survivor, Overcoming Sexual Victimization of Boys and Men
  •, provides resources for pro bono and legal services attorneys and others working to assist low income or disadvantaged clients.
  •, helps low and moderate income people find free legal aid programs in their communities, answers to questions about their legal rights, and find forms to help with their legal problems.
  • Shared Parenting Works has parenting plans and other resources.
  • One in Three Campaign resoures for abused men in Australia.
  • Stop Abuse for Everyone, one of the most comprehensive and oldest sites dedicated to victims of domestic violence. The site was recently upgraded with the assistance of NCFM. The site includes an interactive map of north America for helping find shelter services that might or do help abused men.


%d bloggers like this: