SAVE PRESS RELEASE — ACADEMIA REBELS AGAINST THE PRESUMPTION OF GUILT FOR MEN

August 24, 2011
By

PRESS RELEASE

Contact: Wendy McElroy, 301-801-0608, wmcelroy@saveservices.org

ACADEMIA REBELS AGAINST THE PRESUMPTION OF GUILT FOR MEN

WASHINGTON, Aug. 24 / U.S. Newswire / — Stop Abusive and Violent Environments is calling on the U.S. Department of Education to rescind a controversial directive. The new DED rule forces persons to abandon their due process rights to get an education. Such persons are considered “guilty until proven innocent” whenever an on-campus sexual accusation occurs.

On April 4, the DED Office of Civil Rights instructed every university that accepts federal funds to use a “preponderance (51%) of evidence” standard in evaluating allegations of sexual offense, including rape. An accuser only needs to ‘tip the scales’ for a professor or student to be found “guilty.”

But the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) is now objecting. The group wants sexual accusations to be judged by a higher standard than traffic courts use for parking tickets.

On June 27, Gregory Scholtz, AAUP’s Director of the Department of Academic Freedom, Tenure, and Governance wrote to DED to protest the “lower standard of proof” that threatens “academic freedom and tenure.”

Then on August 18, AAUP’s Chair of the Committee on Women expressed concern about the “potential for accusations, even false ones, to ruin a faculty member’s career.” Backlash from two separate units of the AAUP is remarkable. Their recognition of false accusations is extraordinary.

“People lie for many reasons including revenge and shame; people also make mistakes. This is why courts presume an accused to be innocent and place the burden of proof on the accuser,” explains SAVE spokesman Phil Cook. “Hard evidence and due process are all the more important in sexual cases that often devolve to ‘he said, she said.’”

As a result of the DED directive, campuses are already beginning to reverse the presumption of innocence. Based on questionable data, men are assumed to be predators and women are said to “never lie” about issues like rape.  By lowering the standards of justice, the OCR is encouraging false accusations.

SAVE applauds the AAUP for its courage in demanding the OCR rescind its April 4th mandate. SAVE urges college student parents to contact the Department of Education to demand for due process for all.

The SAVE letter to the Department of Education can be seen here: http://www.saveservices.org/wp-content/uploads/OCRLetter.pdf. SAVE is a national victim advocacy organization working for evidence-based solutions to domestic violence.

NCFM NOTE: If you have read the post immediately before this one you may have noticed that there’s a difference of opinion as to whether the AAUP should be applauded for their efforts, though clearly a clap or two may be in order. Otherwise we are in total agreement with the SAVE press release.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Google Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • Orkut
  • Twitter

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to SAVE PRESS RELEASE — ACADEMIA REBELS AGAINST THE PRESUMPTION OF GUILT FOR MEN

  1. David Currie on August 25, 2011 at 11:54 AM

    DOE is sex discriminative, where an allegation is not robustly investigated for truth, DOE neglects equal support/protection for male victims of female false alligations.

    Recommended reading : search: a1davedi@aol.com : read contents and consider
    Women only victims, men only perpetrators? Gender Discrimination? : and other relivent contents.

    Recommended reading : search: a1davedi@aol.com : read contents and consider
    Women only victims, men only perpetrators? Gender Discrimination? : and other relivent contents.

  2. Ray2447 on August 24, 2011 at 11:03 PM

    A lot more male students and Instructors will become outraged as their rights are trampled by this new misandrist policy. This new policy from the Obama administration, DOE is just one more reason why colleges and universities are sexist, hostile environments against men. This new policy is an increase in the witch-hunting of males that has already been going on in our educational system as a result of the Stalinist, gender feminist ideology trying to impose its perverted model of male gender roles. This new policy is just one more facet of the witch-hunting of males that goes on in Western society as shown in "Witch-Hunting Males" at Youtube. http://tinyurl.com/65dpzwu

    • David Currie on August 25, 2011 at 11:51 AM

      Your comment is correct, DOE is sex discriminative, where an allegation is not robustly investigated for truth, DOE neglects equal support/protection for male victims of female false alligations.

      Recommended reading : search: a1davedi@aol.com : read contents and consider
      Women only victims, men only perpetrators? Gender Discrimination? : and other relivent contents.

Leave a Reply

See NCFM Wayback

waybackmachineOver the years millions of people worldwide have visited a National Coalition For Men website. Also over the years the site has changed dramatically, been taken down, moved, and otherwise uprooted. In those processes much information was lost, not recovered, and does not appear on this site. However you can see earlier versions and many of the extraordinary accomplishments of NCFM back to 1996 by using the WayBackMachine. In the search box type www.ncfm.org

One of the best resources on the Internet for falsely accused college students and their families

ncfm carolinas

Bookmark this site if you are a college student or parent who cares about the children regardless of their age…

a voice for male students

paternity fraud naomi evans meme

Are Things Really Equal?

Girlwriteswhat on ideological feminism and its impact on our society and culture

campus hate speech

More on the war against males in education

sexual harassment on campus

sexual harassment DOE

This explains why our politicians do stupid things about domestic violence

The Richard Fine Saga and Family Court Cartel

Interview with Erin Pizzey, the women who started the domestic violence shelter movement

Click on the picture below for Erin’s website

realsexism.com

sexism

Other MUST WATCH Videos

 

Great Resources for Abused Men

 
  • Dometic Abuse Hotline for Men and Women, based in Maine, offers 24-hour hotline: 1-888-7HELPLINE (1-888-743-5754) and may be offering shelter services.
  • Valley Oasis in Lancater, CA has offers shelter and other services for men and their children. 24-hour Hotline: (661) 945-6736.
  • Family of Men Support Society, Calgary, Canada, shelter and support services.
  • Male Survivor, Overcoming Sexual Victimization of Boys and Men
  • probono.net, provides resources for pro bono and legal services attorneys and others working to assist low income or disadvantaged clients.
  • LawHelp.org, helps low and moderate income people find free legal aid programs in their communities, answers to questions about their legal rights, and find forms to help with their legal problems.
  • Shared Parenting Works has parenting plans and other resources.
  • Walk a Mile in HIS Shoes resources for abused men in Canada.
  • One in Three Campaign resoures for abused men in Australia.
  • Stop Abuse for Everyone, one of the most comprehensive and oldest sites dedicated to victims of domestic violence. The site was recently upgraded with the assistance of NCFM. The site includes an interactive map of north America for helping to find shelter services that might or do help abused men.

More great resources for men and those who care about men. Ask your elected officials if they do.

Men's Health Network

Protect yourself! Get the book!!

RSS AVoiceforMen.com

File a Federal Complaint

If you have specific instances of discrimination against male domestic violence victims by any government-funded DV program anywhere in the U.S., please send all evidence you have to the following federal agencies as a complaint, and state that this violates United States Code, Title 42, Section 3789d(c)(1). Give them as much evidence as you can. They are supposed to investigate it. After several months you may get a letter back saying there is "insufficient evidence" and that they need more information such as dates and times of the discrimination, names of the programs and contact info, names and contact info of witnesses, documents or records, and a detailed chronological narrative. So, re regarding evidence, the more the better. You can send the complaints by email, mail, or both. Send them to: Office of Civil Rights Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice 810 7th Street, NW Washington, DV 20531 Office of the Inspector General inspector.general@usdoj.gov oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

%d bloggers like this: