Call Email Join Donate
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts
Search in pages

NCFM PR Director and International Intactivist Steven Svoboda’s work critiqued in Journal of Medical Ethics

February 1, 2014
By

circumcisionNCFM NOTE:

A momentous debate regarding circumcision took place on January 28, 2014 at the Council of Europe in Strasbourg, France.

Video of the entire 100-minute debate is available here and is also embedded on the ARC website (www.arclaw.org): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUaiXB5xtas

___________________________

Ronald Goldman of the Jewish Circumcision Resource Center and filmmaker Victor Schonfeld were among the participants.

An interview with Schonfeld, which is also available in embedded form on the ARC website, is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYn0UnGBQGI

The Journal of Medical Ethics (JME) has published an e-letter by Robert Van Howe, M.D. and Steven Svoboda in which they respond to a critique published in the JME by notorious circumcision advocate Brian Morris and colleagues. The Morris piece attacked the paper Van Howe and Svoboda publshed in 2013, which critically analyzed the American Academy of Pediatrics’ (AAP’s) 2012 position statement and technical report regarding neonatal circumcision. The publication in the JME of the Svoboda-Van Howe paper was accompanied by the somewhat remarkable concurrent publication of a response by the AAP that attempted to suggest bias on behalf of Svoboda and Van Howe without being able to point to a single specific error anywhere in our article. The Svoboda-Van Howe JME article also influenced the October 2012 debate at the Medical University of South Carolina between the AAP’s Michael Brady, M.D. and Svoboda, in which Brady effectively conceded defeat, finding himself unable to rebut a single one of our numerous arguments and citations.

The e-letter is available at jme.bmj.com/content/early/2013/08/16/medethics-2013-101614.abstract/reply#medethics_el_16775. Morris’ paper, entitled “Veracity and rhetoric in paediatric medicine: a critique of Svoboda and Van Howe’s response to the AAP policy on infant male circumcision,” is available at http://arclaw.org/sites/default/files/j-med-ethics-2013-morris-medethics-2013-101614.pdf. The original paper by Svoboda and Van Howe that Morris attacked can be found at http://arclaw.org/sites/default/files/svoboda-van-howe-aap-jme-2013.pdf.

As many people know, and as our e-letter notes in detail, Morris has violated numerous principles of academic integrity in his tireless, quixotic quest to promote the useless, harmful, and antiquated practice of male circumcision.

You can support ARC’s work by going to http://arclaw.org/donate.

Steven Svoboda
Attorneys for the Rights of the Child

ObamaCircumcision is a decision best left to the individual when they reach the age of majority.

Botched circumcision often destroys lives.

Forced circumcision is genital mutilation.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.