Ladiesā nights, career seminars and paternity fraud are all on the docket.
ByĀ Katherine Rosman
July 13, 2018
SAN DIEGO ā Rich Allison is a former Marine Corps captain who was never in combat. Now he is on the front lines of the culture wars.
Mr. Allison, 47, is a key player in a movement of menās rights activists challenging female-focused businesses, marketing strategies, educational programs and civic projects that have surged since the election of President Trump in November 2016 andĀ the #MeToo movement.
He has been a plaintiff in 13 lawsuits, most of which cite discrimination against men in violation of Californiaās Unruh Civil Rights Act, named for the politicianĀ Jesse Unruh, known as āBig Daddy.ā It outlaws discrimination against all people by any type of business establishment in the state, regardless of a personās sex, race and other characteristics. Mr. Allison and his cohort would like to remind everyone that Unruhās broad promise of āfull and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges or servicesā extends to men.
āI believe in social justice and fairness,ā Mr. Allison said.
Since September 2017, he has filed three suits, including one last month against Financial Services Information Sharing and Analysis Center, a nonprofit that helps the financial services industry with physical security and cybersecurity. In 2016, the organization started a āDiversity Scholarshipā that awards female recipients $5,000 apiece, along with covering the costs of attending an industry conference.
āCybersecurity is made up of well over 90 percent men and the idea is that diversity of thought, including from gender, will really improve our cybersecurity as a nation,ā said Bill Nelson, the organizationās president and C.E.O. āWe saw this lawsuit and felt like, āNo good deed should go unpunished.āā
The use of Unruh by menās rights activists reflects āa gross misunderstanding of the nature of our sexist society and of what is specifically going on in the state of California,ā said Larry Organ, the lead lawyer at the California Civil Rights Law Group, whose headquarters are in Oakland, Calif.
Yet it is also revealing potential legal holes in certain current feminist strategy.

A sign at the National Coalition for Men in San Diego. Credit John Francis Peters for The New York Times
Meet the Plaintiffs
On a sunny Thursday in June, Mr. Allison walked slowly down the stairs of a strip mall commercial center in downtown San Diego to talk about his efforts.
Shy-seeming, he declined to have his photograph taken. āJust trying to keep a relaxed state,ā he said, as he sat down in the national headquarters of the National Coalition for Men, which is decorated with posters (āCombat Deaths 99.9% Male,ā), stacks of books (āHotsy Totsy FemiNaziā and āAbused Men: The Hidden Side of Domestic Violenceā), buttons (āProsecute false accusers!ā āCalifornia is Sexist & Hateful Against Menā) and bumper stickers (āDonāt be THAT girl: Embarrassed about a hookup? Angry at a boyfriend? Willing to destroy a life?ā).
Mr. Allison was sitting with Allan Candelore, 34, another N.C.F.M. member and frequent plaintiff, and Harry Crouch, 68, the coalitionās president.
Mr. Crouch, who grew up in Anchorage, said he began working in menās rights after a relationship with an abusive woman led him to seek state funding for a program for abused men. He was told men donāt qualify for such grants, he said.
After moving to Southern California, Mr. Crouch met Philip W. Cook, the author of āAbused Men,ā who told him about N.C.F.M., which emerged from menās rights groups that formed in the late 1970s and early 1980s, in the wake of feminismās second wave. Mr. Crouch attended a meeting in Los Angeles and joined.

Harry Crouch, president of the National Coalition for Men, in his office. CreditĀ John Francis Peters for The New York Times
Harry Crouch, president of the National Coalition for Men, in his office.CreditJohn Francis Peters for The New York Times
He started a paternity-testing business in San Diego, but it didnāt take off. He then opened a space called the California Menās Center, which he hoped would become a shelter for men. When he learned that the coalitionās president was seeking a successor, Mr. Crouch raised his hand and turned the California Menās Center into N.C.F.M.ās headquarters.
From there he oversees its website, which lists 29 chapters in cities around America and in Israel, Canada and Kenya, and its social-media feeds. N.C.F.M. is a registered 501(c)(3) with assets of $115,182, according toĀ GuideStar.
Swag includes bracelets that say, āSave the Males.ā
Mr. Allison, a divorced father of three, was drawn to the movement after observing that popular culture can diminish the importance of men in families and society. He found aĀ T-Mobile adĀ that ran during Super Bowl XLIX in 2015 particularly galling. In it, the comedian Sarah Silverman hands a couple their newborn baby and says, āSorry, itās a boy.ā
āIf you took the flip side and said, āSorry, itās a girl,āā Mr. Candelore said, āweād be up in arms.ā
Mr. Candelore works for his fatherās law firm, Menās Legal Center, in the same building as the N.C.F.M. office. It largely represents men in divorce, custody and paternity cases. (The firm has female clients as well, Mr. Candelore said, including paternal grandmothers fighting for visitation rights.)
He is also an active plaintiff, who won a ruling in aĀ case against TinderĀ for age discrimination and is pursuing another case against Facebook for itsĀ ethnically selective advertising practices, even after the company suspended them. In a statement, Tinder said it intends to fight on; Facebook did not comment.
A fellow plaintiff on the Facebook matter, Bert Riddick, 59, came to the menās rights movement after being involved in a paternity fraud case. For years, Mr. Riddickās paycheck was docked $800 a month for child support, though DNA tests revealed the child was not his.Ā HeĀ successfully arguedĀ to have $168,000 inĀ additional child support debt erased but was not able to recover the money he had paid.
Mr. Allison is the graduate of a boysā prep school in Connecticut who attended the University of Southern California and has worked in information technology. He traces his interest in discrimination cases to his military service, during which he was stationed with his family in Japan.
āI just think I was a little bit more sensitive when I was back here toward fairness,ā Mr. Allison said. āYou see whoās putting the load on things, whoās contributing back to society.ā
Getting involved in the N.C.F.M. and filing Unruh cases have helped him channel difficult emotions into positive action, he said.
āIt gave a purpose to some of the things that I was feeling instead of basically complaining and it doesnāt go anywhere. At least you can focus on things instead of internalizing it,ā Mr. Allison said. āI think as men we have a tendency to internalize a lot of things and it puts some people over the edge, where they may do something to harm themselves and harm others.ā
Testing the āMan Taxā
The coalition members have become known around town as men who want to know when a bar or club is offering a discount on admissions or drinks only to women.
āI get feedback from people saying, āHey, look, someoneās having this event,āā Mr. Allison said. āOr I get something from a promoter, telling me, āHey, theyāre trying to do thisā or āThis business is doing this thing, weāre being honest and then these other guys are being underhanded by letting women in free to a place.āā
Then Mr. Allison and his associates will go ātest outā the place, meaning they will go to an establishment or event and seek the special access or price being offered to women, sometimes with a cover story.
After being turned away or charged more, the plaintiffs work with a lawyer and decide whether to sue. āI have never filed a case that has been frivolous or anything like that,ā Mr. Allison said.
He did not want to discuss the specifics of any actions, but here is a sampling:

Allan Candelore, a member of N.C.F.M. and a frequent plaintiff in Unruh cases. CreditJohn Francis Peters for The New York Times
Allan Candelore, a member of N.C.F.M. and a frequent plaintiff in Unruh cases.CreditJohn Francis Peters for The New York Times
*In 2010, Mr. Allison was a plaintiff on a class action civil-rights suit filed against the heavy metal band Five Finger Death Punch, House of Blues and Live Nation after he, Mr. Crouch, Mr. Candelore and Jackie Durazo, who was then an in-law of Mr. Candeloreās, went to the bandās āChicks for Freeā concert and the men were charged $27 for admission butĀ Ms. DurazowasĀ not. āThey ambulance chase these events and make a little money for themselves,ā said Allen Kovac, now the manager of the band. āThis sort of thing is a stain on laws that are meant to level the playing field.ā
*In 2013 Mr. Allison, along with Mr. Crouch, Mr. Candelore and another plaintiff namedĀ JeffĀ Perwein, suedĀ Maderas Country Club, in Poway, Calif., as well as a company calledĀ Women on Course, for hosting a recurring networking event for women called Clinic & Cocktail.
*A few months later, the same group andĀ Carolyn Bell, the N.C.F.M. membership coordinator, sued El Mundo Del Tango, a restaurant and bar in San Diego, after the men were required to pay a cover charge. Ms. Bell was not.
All of these cases were settled, and the defendants wouldnāt comment.
In a more recent case, Mr. Allison sued Poway Weapons & Gear, Inc. for providing, once a month, free use of its shooting range to female patrons, as well as a lounge and raffle.

Buttons in Mr. Crouch’s office bear slogans like “Prosecute false accusers!” Credit John Francis Peters for The New York Times
āI emphatically deny the allegations, and it will be easily proven in court,ā said John Phillips, the owner of Poway. āWe have pictures of men in the so-called womenās lounges, and we actually have had complaints from women that men were winning too many of the raffles.ā
Mr. Allison, Mr. Candelore and Mr. Crouch all say that their court actions benefit womenās rights because special-drink offers and differences in cover charges, in particular, are often intended to draw female customers as a bait for men.
āIf youāre giving preferential treatment to women, youāre discriminating against them as well,ā Mr. Crouch said. āThatās funny, but you are. Youāre exploitingĀ them.ā
When Mr. Allison, Mr. Crouch or other would-be plaintiffs go to establishments to test them, they on occasion have brought Ms. Bell, 51, because they need a woman, she said, to prove different treatment.
She had tested establishments five or six times before she made the case to the men that she should be included as a plaintiff so she could share in the financial rewards.
Ms. Bell said she received about $1,500 from the El Mundo Del Tango suit. āI didnāt get equal pay,ā she said. āI kept joking that I should sue them.ā
A Defendant Speaks
Last September, Mr. Allison sued Ladies Get Paid, a career-development company for women, after he was turned away from one of its gatherings at a bar in San Diego. (Mr. Allison also sued theĀ bar and barās owner.)
Founded in 2016 by Claire Wasserman, a former marketing director, Ladies Get Paid was intended as a āsafe zone,ā she said, where women could speak openly about money and issues contributing to pay disparities and āuncomfortable gender dynamics at work.ā Events of different sizes have cost from $15 to $60 and have featured professional coaches and other speakers.
A second suit against Ladies Get Paid was also filed, on behalf of a man named George St. George, who, the complaint said, was turned away from an event in Los Angeles.
Ms. Wasserman was stunned to find herself on the wrong side of discrimination suits. āAt first I felt really guilty and just thought, āHow could I have been so stupid for starting something that keeps some people out?āā
āThen I got over my guilt,ā she said. āThen I got mad.ā
California law provides that if the court finds there has been a civil-rights violation, the defendant is subject to a fine and must pay the prevailing plaintiffās legal fees and costs. Ms. Wassermanās company is new and self-funded; she took her lawyerās advice, which was to settle the cases. She has changed her companyās policy, and it now welcomes men atĀ events.
āWe donāt have the money to fight it,ā Ms. Wasserman said. āThese guys are winning. We are rolling over and funding them.ā
The Lawyer
Behind almost all of this litigation is a lawyer named Alfred G. Rava, 62. Formerly a secretary of N.C.F.M., he has filed some 300 Unruh cases. For the last three years, he has filed at a rate of about one per month. Citing a disability, he declined to meet in person for an interview, or to speak on the phone, but was a willing email correspondent.
Mr. Rava wrote that his desire to hold companies accountable for differential treatment came from growing up in the anthracite fields of northeastern Pennsylvania, where he saw āhow the wealthy mine owners mistreated the poor Polish, Italian and Irish immigrant coal miners, such as my grandfathers, uncles and father.ā
He said that his work has benefited women as well as men. He pointed to aĀ class-action settlementĀ of $370,000 after a drinks-special lawsuit Mr. Rava filed against the parent company of Tony Romaās, with Mr. Riddick as the plaintiff.
Mr. Rava also noted that he served as consultant to the lawyer representing a woman who in 2009 filed a suit against MasterCuts, a chain of hair salons, for offering coupon discounts only to men.
Mr. Rava graduated from Penn State with a degree in environmental science and helped design wastewater treatment equipment and other environmental products in Houston. He sued two former employers for nonpayment of commissions and won a jury verdict against an insurance company after it denied a $6,500 claim on a damaged car.
Motivated, he said, to āhelp other people who got screwed,ā he enrolled at California Western School of Law, in San Diego.
In 2002 he went to a bar in San Diegoās Gaslamp Quarter and was charged a $10 admission fee that women didnāt have to pay. āI asked the bouncer if I could get in for free, and he told me he would do so if I went home and put on a skirt and some lipstick,ā Mr. Rava wrote.
Instead, āI did some research on the internet and discovered that ladiesā night and charging men more than women for cover charges or for drinks constituted sex discrimination under California law, specifically the Unruh Civil Rights Act.āĀ He suedĀ the bar and won.
In 2009, the Oakland Athletics baseball team and Macyās agreed to a reported $500,000Ā settlement for a Rava suitĀ of gender discrimination after a 2004 Motherās Day weekend promotion: The team had given free hats to the first 7,500 women who showed up for aĀ game.
Not all of the businesses Mr. Rava sues concede. In 2011, a client took on the Trump National Golf Club in Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., claiming that it discriminated against men by offering female golfers a 25 percent discount and partial donation of their greens fees to research during Breast Cancer Awareness Month.
A judge agreed withĀ Trump OrganizationĀ lawyers that the case Mr. Rava filed should be dismissed, a decision an appellate court upheld.
In the last year or so, nearly all of Mr. Ravaās Unruh discrimination complaints ā a December 2017 suit against the Pendry Hotel in San Diego, among other defendants; a June 6 filing against a strip club that hosted a āLesbian Nightā ā have begun with a quote from āAnimal Farmā by George Orwell: āAll animals are equal, but some animals are more equal thanĀ others.ā
āJust One of the Girlsā
Mr. Rava has a new client: Lawrence Pollister, known as Abe, a self-described āliberal, pro-gender equality feminist.ā
In May, Mr. Rava filed a class action Unruh lawsuit on behalf of Mr. Pollister, 29, after a November 2017 comedy show for a female-only audience performed by Iliza Shlesinger at a theater in Los Angeles. Ms. Shlesinger; a production company and its owner; and United Talent Agency, which booked the gig, are cited as defendants.
Mr. Pollister said in an email interview that he bought tickets to Ms. Shlesingerās āNo Boys Allowedā performance after having seen her do stand-up a few weeks earlier. He assumed āNo Boys Allowedā was the name of her show, like BeyoncĆ©ās āFormation.ā
But when he and a female friend showed up at the club and went to the will-call booth to retrieve their tickets, Mr. Pollister was denied entry by a club employee, he said, because he is a man.
āOh no, honey, Iām just one of the girls! Iām gay,ā he told her.
The employee told him, he said, that Ms. Shlesinger explicitly wasnāt allowing men into the show.
Mr. Pollister, who moved to California from New Mexico to escape what he called āan oppressive Republican rural community who ostracized and tortured me for being an effeminate gay man,ā was humiliated and upset to be excluded, he said.
He said he sought an apology through Ms. Shlesingerās representatives, but did not receive one and began to do research about discrimination law.
Then he read that a suit had already been filed, by Mr. Rava on behalf of Mr. St. George, the plaintiff on one of the Ladies Get Paid suits. Mr. Pollister contacted the lawyer, who dismissed Mr. St. Georgeās suit and then refiled it as a class action with Mr. Pollisterās name atop the complaint.
āWhat Iliza did that night was an attack on gender equality,ā said Mr. Pollister, who in a subsequent email alluded to the recentĀ Supreme Court rulingĀ in favor of Masterpiece Cakeshop, which had refused to create a cake for a gay wedding.
āMy motivations are purely political. I donāt want someone to say, āI wonāt bake a cake for you because youāre gay,āā Mr. Pollister wrote. āHow is that different from saying, āI wonāt let you in this theater because youāre a man?āā
He also invoked one of #MeTooās most cherished phrases.
āA marginalized group of people doesnāt need to exclude others to create a āsafe space.āā Mr. Pollister wrote. āDoing so actually does exactly the opposite, and gives power to your oppressors.ā
Doris Burke contributed reporting.
NCFM Featured in New York Times Article, #HeToo? A Fight for Menās Rights, in California CourtsĀ
Join NCFM and help us make the world a better place for all of us…

























