UPDATE: March 3, 2020
Oral argument in NCFM v Selective Service was heard on March 3, 2020 at Tulane University in New Orleans.
You can hear the oral arguments in this historic event here: www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/19/19-20272_3-3-2020.mp3.MP3 It’s well work a listen for anyone interested in the equitable treatment of men and women. Our attorney, Marc Angelucci’s argument begins on the recording at 12:51 .
Mr. Angelucci, as you can hear if you listen to the recording above, did a well-reasoned, passionate and overall awesome job, all of which is an enormous understatement.
Mr. Angelucci, also argued at the University of Southern California (USC) School of Law a landmark paternity fraud case, which helped change paternity laws in California by providing a legal escape window for cock-holded men.
While we anticipate a positive outcome in the Selective Service System case it may be a year or so before this court issues a decision, which basically gives Congress more time to resolve the issue. This case has the potential of changing not only our culture but the way the world sees conscription and the disposability of men.
Harry Crouch
President, NCFM
________________________________________________
Posted: January 28, 2019:
Oral argument in NCFM v Selective Service will be on March 3, 2020 at Tulane University in New Orleans, in the morning session. Sometimes courts of appeal send their interesting public interest cases to law schools or universities for students to watch, like when they sent our attorney and Vice-President Marc Angelucci to the University of Southern California (USC) School of Law to argue a landmark paternity fraud case, which helped change paternity laws in California by providing a legal escape window for cock-holded men. Mr. Angelucci is our attorney for our Selective Service case too. We anticipate a positive outcome in New Orleans.
We have other potential cases, but they are expensive to take on and we can use all the financial support we can get. Unlike similar organizations that only help women we take no government funds, none; and, never have. While we are a men’s human rights organization we do not discriminate based on gender. Our work helps all of us.
If you want to help us continue to help you make the world a better place for all of us, you can donate here (DONATE) and become a member (JOIN NCFM) here.
You can watch the video about this effort by clicking on the picture above or clicking here (VIDEO):
Thank you.
Harry Crouch
President, NCFM
I was not aware that the hearing had been held. After listening to the audio, I feel it went well. Congratulations to Marc and the team, It will be interesting to see what happens after the report to Congress is presented on March 25th
I was not aware that the hearing had been held. After listening to the audio, I feel it went well. Congratulations to Marc and the team, It will be interesting to see what happens after the report to Congress is presented on March 25th
Not only is the male only requirement unconstitutional, the pointless age range set is also age-based discrimination. All branches of military will enlist people whom are beyond 25 years, so it makes no sense to have such a limitation-requirement. Also, there is no point that “registration” is then not automatic, since it s a “requirement”!
Hello. Congratulations to Mr. Angelucci for doing a great job. Honestly though I believe that it is VERY immoral and “illegal” that the all-male draft has been declared unconstitutional for over a year now and may be so for another year until the Fifth Circuit renders a decision and yet men still are required, under all threats of punishment, to STILL REGISTER. I believe both Judge Miller and Salas in the Kyle-Labell case should have, if they did not order injunctive relief to have women register or do away with selective service, at least granted a MORATORIUM ON MALE REGISTRATION until the courts and Congress “worked things out.” It is unfair that men, who have waited over 150 years with this, must be at the “mercy” of Congress which has all the political and cultural inventive to do nothing as it usual does regarding many different issues. But I hope ultimately this will be a success. Good Luck! Thanks. With Respect
Thanks for the update, Harry! I was checking daily for an updated post.
My sincere thanks to the NCFM for their legal efforts to end the military draft for men only. I served with the U.S. Army; 4th I.D.; 2/8th Infantry, Republic of Vietnam 1969-1970. The male only military draft during the Vietnam War was extremely oppressive, discriminatory, and sexist. During that same time period, laws were passed which gave other privileges to women over men including affirmative action in employment and education. The feminist movement, along with the aforementioned, has resulted in an extremely discriminatory environment for men in the USA. Ending the injustice of the male only military draft may be just the beginning with regard to addressing the unjust and discriminatory laws and practices against men.
Excellent work by the entire NCFM team to get to this point!
“Cock-holded”
Too funny
..but true!