Mr. Manners Talks Back to His Critics (Satire)

Dear Manners:

I can’t understand how a credible organization like the National Coalition For Men publishes your crap. In your article “Mr.  Manners Quarterly Report”, you mentioned that men are much more likely to bowl than women, yet female college bowling is an NCAA sport, but not male bowling.  Add other sports to bowling and clearly there are thousands of more male students with the desire to play college sports than women. They lack the opportunity to do so because of the fact that Title IX requires equal representation by sex.

Compare that to another Title IX sports issue, that being transgenders in sports. National College Athletic Association President Charlie Baker pointed out that he knows of fewer than ten current transgender college athletes. Many journalists are extremely upset about the idea of excluding transgender women in sports. Many in the same group praise the fact that due to Title IX there are is relative equality in NCAA sports participation by sex. This is despite greater interest by men to participate in sports, greater student interest, meaning greater revenue, among other things.

So why did you not ask why the media gives so much coverage to the small number of trans-women’s in female sports, while ignoring or distorting issues regarding all the male athletes deprived of a chance to play college sports due to Title IX?  You stupid moron.

Another example of your lack of intellectual fecundity appears in your article “Whose Afraid of Naomi Wolf”. You end the piece quoting the title of feminist Helen Lewis’s “Atlantic” article “From “Feminist’s to Rightwing Conspiracist”. Thus implying as Lewis did, that Wolf’s views about the covid vaccine means Wolf is no longer a feminist.  What possible logic supports such a conclusion?

Need I point out, that in your same article, you quoted Wolf’s words from a 2019 interview where she affirmed her views from the “The Beauty Myth.” Feminist want to distance themselves from her, but where is the evidence that Wolf no longer thinks of herself as a feminist? Did I mention you are a stupid moron?

P.S How’s the family.

Sincerely,

Your Uncle Frank

Dear Uncle Frank:

How wonderful to hear from you. To answer the question you wrote about, the family is fine.

Great to know you are a fan of my work. Still l take issue with something you said. As you mentioned, Wolf posits paranoid theories about the COVID vaccine. This contrasts with her insight about the male conspiracy against women. The conspiracy includes, the media, advertising and menfolk around the world. Also, men against their sisters, mothers, daughters, granddaughters, wives and dental hygiene professionals.

You are a widower who was married to a housewife, in other words an exploiter of women, know this all too well. This economic exploitation is why male breadwinners in these situations take out life insurance so their wives will have money if the husband dies.  The husbands the ones who will be destroyed financially if their wives die, do not get life insurance if she passes away. Wives no longer having the burden of the exploiting full time working husband and thus richer, get the insurance money. If that does not make perfect sense, what does?

Dear Mr. Manners:

I was reading Dr. Warren Farrell’s book “The Myth of Male Power” and his chapter about the twelve female only defenses for violent crime, including murder. Let me note that countless studies consistently show that regarding heterosexual couples, men and women commit similar amounts of domestic violence. As far as severe violence, they find females are significantly more likely to commit domestic violence than the reverse.

Women though we have learned are not violent. Instead, they are cursed with syndromes unique to women that cause aggression, meaning they should not be culpable. An example being Pre-Menstrual Syndrome. So if women assault their husbands, it is okay, because after all the victim (the woman) is experiencing a sickness. Of course, there are no hormonal or any other kind of issue that excuse male violent behavior against women.

Also, men are usually stronger than women, so accidental injuries to women. even death is more likely to occur in self-defense by men than women. Exacerbating this, is the lack of domestic violence shelters for men. I also should add, even when women assault the privileged sex (men) are often the ones arrested. What do you suggest?

Sincerely, Harold the Horrified Man.

Dear Horrible Man:

First, you based your data on the countless scientific studies that show domestic violence is a two-way street. Meaning you are taking science over words from feminist’s, whose careers often depends on female victimhood. It should be obvious to you which data is more objective.

What about your example of Pre-Menstrual Syndrome? Feminist advocates understand the harmlessness of it by looking at their own lives. The typical feminist with no children, would only be subject to this disease during their fertile years. Meaning it occurs for a day or so, or perhaps a couple of weeks each month, for about thirty years, meaning about 360 months.  Besides those times it is nothing to worry about.  In other words, violence by the sufferer victimized with the disease, is no big deal to family members.

In fact, women attacking men due to pre-menstrual syndrome is funny. How do I know? Even the person you cited Warren Farrell, noted the hilarity of PMS violence in his book “Women Don’t Hear What Men Don’t Say”. He cited an episode of “Oprah” describing four men married to unfortunate women who are victims of the syndrome. Farrell observed, the husbands of the sufferers: “wives hit them in the lower back with a pole, cracked them over the head or in the neck with a frying pan.” All of course, non-violently. Farrell noted about the show that:  “the audience renews its laughter after each story” of the PMS survivors. Meaning you as one male chauvinist, are asserting your sense of humor as the standard, even though a room full of women disagreed. OPRAH WOMEN.

Suppose a man gets convicted of murdering his spouse, even if it is in reality self-defense? All that happens is he goes to prison. Perhaps for life. Meaning, lifetime free rent, free wardrobe, free food, breakfast in bed, free exercise yard, with free equipment and so on. Also, convenience.  For instance, the toilet is just a long step from the bed. In addition, I hear that many inmates are able to have an active social life, although a number against their will.  Meanwhile, the syndrome suffering women have to buy their own wardrobe and deal with their PMS.

By the way Harold, I just heard from our Uncle Frank. See you at the family picnic…

NCFM Mr. Manners Talks Back to His Critics

Tags: breadwinner, chauvinist, Feminist’s to Rightwing Conspiracist, Myth of Male Power, Naomi Wolf, national coalition for men, National College Athletic Association, Oprah, The Beauty Myth, title ix, victimhood, warren farrell