Marc Angelucci, Esq.
Marc E. Angelucci is a practicing attorney who has taken on high profile cases involving paternity fraud and male victims of domestic violence in CaliforniaHe graduated phi beta kappa from U.C Berkeley in 1996 with a B.A. in Philosophy and received a J.D. from UCLA School of Law in 2000 where he received several public interest awards and founded two student bar associations.
He joined NCFM as a law student in 1997 after seeing his friend physically abused for years by his wife and then denied domestic violence services because he is male. In 2001 he formed the L.A. chapter of NCFM and served as its president until 2008, during which time NCFM-LA became an active chapter that organized rallies, filed lawsuits and received significant media attention.
Angelucci has worked as a family law attorney for the Men’s Legal Center in San Diego. He also has experience in mental health law, poverty law, appellate advocacy and construction litigation.
In 2008 he won a landmark appellate case against the State of California (Woods v. Horton) which held it is unconstitutional to exclude male victims of domestic violence from state funding for victim services. He also helped draft and enact legislation to stop paternity fraud, served on the California DCSS Paternity Committee, served on the Training Committee of the L.A. County Domestic Violence Council, and testified before the California Senate and Assembly Judiciary committees.The Southern Poverty Law Center invited him to be an Honoree on their Wall of Tolerance, co-sponsored by Rosa Parks and Morris Dees.
He has appeared on the Dr. Phil Show, Phil Donahue, John and Ken and other radio and media, has been quoted numerous times in the the Daily Journal and other newspapers and has published op-eds in the L.A. Times and elsewhere on men’s issues.
I am a certified paralegal from the PCC program.
The last law class I took at PCC was Family Law with Professor Angelucci. I had previously graduated with a paralegal certificate, but returned to further my legal training. Mr. Angelucci went above and beyond to help the students, made himself available by email or in person, and was supportive in every aspect. As a class project, I chose to view a recommended DVD by Mr. Angelucci and write a report on it, called “Divorce Corp”, which details the devastating money-making legal enterprise of lawyers setting divorcing couples against each other, resulting in financial devastation for both parties, to the benefit of the legal system. It was shocking and eye-opening, and revealed some real villains in the legal system. I highly recommend it, as it set me on a path towards advocating for judicial reform.
Mr. Angelluci wasn’t just for protecting men’s rights; he was for protecting the rights of All people who get caught up in the legal system, with no protection for their personal or legal rights. He inspired me to fight for justice more than any other law teacher I had.
Thank you. That is the way we remember Marc too…
Thank you for writing this… Marc is still frequently on my mind. He was representing me in my appeal and was like my big brother- always looking out for the underdog. If any of you lawyers would be willing to help me with my case…. Marc believed it was a slam dunk. Please let me know therealjenniferjohnson@gmail.com
I seen 48 hours and was compelled to try and find out if there is still an organization helping fathers through nasty long drawn out divorce
NCFM is still involved with Kit’s situation and one other. Unfortunately, we don’t have the resources for anymore.
Marc was a great guy who did great work. I had him for two paralegal courses at PCC, including one that finished just last month. I enjoyed both, and hearing about all of his men’s rights and other advocacy and appellate work. He had done so much, and clearly had so much more he wanted to do. I am sad for him, for his lost opportunities, and for all of us, for losing his bright future and assistance in improving our society.
I was a student of Mr.Angelucci’s at PCC as well. He was a great teacher and his passion for the law was contagious. I am deeply saddened by the loss, he was going to do big thing.
The last law class I took at PCC was Family Law with Professor Angelucci. I had previously graduated with a paralegal certificate, but returned to further my legal training. Mr. Angelucci went above and beyond to help the students, made himself available by email or in person, and was supportive in every aspect. As a class project, I chose to view a recommended DVD by Mr. Angelucci and write a report on it, called “Divorce Corp”, which details the devastating money-making legal enterprise of lawyers setting divorcing couples against each other, resulting in financial devastation for both parties, to the benefit of the legal system. It was shocking and eye-opening, and revealed some real villains in the legal system. I highly recommend it, as it set me on a path towards advocating for judicial reform.
Mr. Angelluci wasn’t just for protecting men’s rights; he was for protecting the rights of All people who get caught up in the legal system, with no protection for their personal or legal rights. He inspired me to fight for justice more than any other law teacher I had.
[…] because he advocated for fathers… […]
Is there a connection between him and the other men’s rights attorney who committed suicide and has been implicated in a murder of a judge’s son in New Jersey? Same M-o, fake delivery man.
This is like a John Grisham film.
Who knew
Is there a connection between him and the other men’s rights attorney who committed suicide and has been implicated in a murder of a judge’s son in New Jersey?
That is what the media is trying to insinuate but I have my doubts. The media theory is way too pat for me to accept. It is like an orchestrated plot. Both Marc Angelucci and Roy Den Hollander are dead. Make the claim that Roy Den Hollander murdered Marc Angelucci and it’s case closed. That is not only way too convenient but it allows anyone else involved to escape justice.
If others are involved that may be true, but it assumes some widespread well executed conspiracy. Thus far there is no evidence to support such a notion, at least none of which we are aware.
Yes! They are all connected. Follow the bread crumbs.
He was not murdered “because he advocated for fathers”. Similarly, feminists had nothing to do with it – he was murdered because he was perceived to be a too moderate by a mentally ill nemesis who was an anti-feminist himself and so consumed with hate that after murdering Mr. Angelucci he killed a judge and then himself.
That is the narrative the media is selling.
Wrong answer. He was murdered because he was exposing corruption in the court. He was on a high profile case of fraud and extortion by the judge.
💯
Weirdo papa
[…] COUNTY, CA – They say the wheels of justice turn slow, but for Jerry Cox and his attorney Marc Angelucci, the wheels of justice have been flattened at every turn by a state justice system no longer blind […]
I need help to in Maryland on false accusations. Thanks
You are welcome to call us: 619-231-1909…
[…] Marc Angelucci—an attorney and NCFM board member—told TPM that the OCR is taking steps in the right direction. […]
Andalucci would go to any length to make a buck or headline. Now he has latched on to child removal cases, but before he gets in too deep he needs to learn the term Due Process
Urgent please contact me Rebecca zulauf I am involved with crg and they are still in my property supposed to be $40,000 in repairs and they took my $700,000 house that I paid on for 35 years 619-448-5999 please help me please at least call me
Why do you hate women so much?
Why are you so ignorant? Insulting isn’t it. We don’t hate women. Many of our supporters and members are women, including our Treasurer. And, just in case you have difficulty reading too, our mission statement, which you can find on all pages of our website, is: “Since 1977, NCFM has been committed to ending harmful discrimination and stereotypes against boys, men, their families and the women who love them.
We are a gender inclusive, nonpartisan, ethnically diverse organization that effects civil rights reform through advocacy, education, outreach, services and litigation. So, exactly how is it that you figure we hate women? We strongly suggest that you spend more time understanding our organization, our issues and our members before making more ignorant remarks. You may wish to look up the difference between the word “ignorance” and “stupid” too, just make sure you know the difference…
Wow, you are incredibly stupid, Jasta.
Why do you hate men so much, Jasta?
What a bunch of snowflakes. Why don’t you fight for ERA or equal pay as well? Because, awwww poor men, they get the shaft every time, right?
Oh, and you DIDN’T WIN with your bs case, so.. byeeee
Annie,
Well, if you spend a bit more time learning about us rather than defaming snow you will find that for the past 40 years we have been huge supporters of equal rights and equal pay for equal work; and, we still are. Some of us, including me, believe strongly that the first ERA should have been approved by the states and ratified by Congress. Had that happened I would not have to waste time typing about inclement weather and ridiculous assumptions from people who have no idea what they are talking about. And, we did win. You should read the court decision. The judge clearly ruled the MSSS system is unconstitutional. Just in case you are somehow implying that because the court did not stop the MSSS with an injuctive relief order does not make the system constitutionally viable. To be more clear, we, NCFM have absolutely no position on whether the MSSS system should continue or be shut down. Not our issue. Not our concern. In case of armed conflicts our government will figure out other ways to put our citizens in harms way. You, like many others, miss the point. Frankly, I’m tired of explaining it (them). So, if you are interested in doing more than goading us because of your ignorance, we suggest you do your homework, learn the truth and comment based on facts rather than emotional drivel.
We have the late Phylis Schlafly to thank for killing the original ERA.
True. Had the ERA passed men would have been much better off…
Wow, you sound like a real idiot! And we DID win the case, I guess you’re too stupid to read it.
Yeah
Poor snowflakes we men are
97% of alimony paid by men
75% of suicide
99% plus of men die in war
Why don’t you come over to our side and see if you don’t lose your mind with the pressure we endure and the sacrifice it takes to be a man.
Women that have transgendered to men complain how hard it is for them. A.woman did a 3 month study dressed and acting as a man. She nearly lost her mind from the pressure.
Men work longer, harder, dirtier, life risking jobs in order to keep this country functional for you unpleasable entitled beings. Far be it from you to break a nail or risk your life.
You women are soooooo awesome and yet soooooo unhappy that you file 75% of divorces so you can rape a man in court to take his money, freedom, children, careers and even our lives. Yep, rape culture is alive and well and women rape men through the court system with no conscience nor remorse.
Talk about snowflakes. Women just camouflage those snowflakes as crocodile tears…
The fact is a woman can get together with a very wealthy man and become a queen. A man can get together with a wealthy woman and he’s using her. Women file false rape claims in devastating numbers and when proven false a mans life is ruined yet her lies have no consequences. Women take a man’s condom and gets herself pregnant without his consent and takes his money in court with no consequences. That’s a literal definition of rape. Part of my body wis forced inside your body without my consent. So you rape a man and get paid for it.
Women are entitled creatures that men have allowed to be privileged without recourse for bad behavior and no responsibility for the balance of privelage just like the rights you were given to vote and yet you didn’t have to serve in the military.
Grow up princes
[…] Marc Angelucci, the named attorney representing plaintiff in the case and attorney for National Coalition for Men, a nonprofit men’s rights organization; he is also an adjunct professor of business at Pasadena City College […]
Congrats on your win Mr. Angelucci! I look forward to the Commission’s response.
[…] Marc Angelucci, NCFM’s lawyer, told PJ Media he does not know whether or not the Selective Service will appeal. “I don’t think they’ll win an appeal,” he said. […]
Great win, just now, Marc!
hey just wondering if you have anything in canada like the cafe group in collages that are now in canada and the light house projects helping men with false accusations but do you know any soild mens rights lawyers that would help me with my family court case in canada vancouver bc area my child moved 900km away to nelson bc where they denie services till i forced child protectoon services to do there job what groups are there to help and im a vetted indviudal
Hi Martin,
No, we can’t help you with the lawyer referral. However, CAFE does excellent work and if anyone would know of someone who may be able to help you it should be CAFE. We are not familiar with the Light House Projects.
Dear Mr. Angelucci,
I am a 73 year old ex-draftee with five granddaughters. My last name is Docherty pronounced like Liberty. I have been against the draft for anyone for many years. I did not go to Vietnam but I feel that I have a form of PTSD stress because I was forced into the Army. The draft is unconstitutional! Which part of involuntary servitude doesn’t the courts understand? Thanks for your efforts.
[…] The lawsuit, filed by California lawyer Marc Angelucci, challenges the SSS’s policy of requiring that all United States men sign up for the draft. According to federal law, all men must register within 30 days of their 18th birthday or face a variety of penalties. […]
How is this lawsuit proceeding i cant find any news about what should be a historic case is the fight still ongoing? can we expect a win?
It’s pending in the Texas court. The Attorney General’s last response did not challenge any of our arguments. The AG only said that the Court should let Congress decide. We anticipate a decision soon.
Marc, Unbelievable that your against women driving women, Chariot For Women.
How can this be sexist when this could be saving women from getting attacked. It almost happened to my daughters friend. Safety is first and I’m guessing you don’t have a daughter. I think if you had a daughter and she was sexually attacked you would change your mind. I imagine this is an male ego thing for you. Oh well, I’d rather see people safe than to be sorry in the end!!!!!!
Kent, apparently you didn’t pay attention. I have no problem with women driving women. What I oppose is a business refusing to hire or serve men. That is sex discrimination in public a accommodation and it violates the Unruh Civil Rights Act. .
Marc, we have some information about the credibility of Sarah Williamson or her agents in the Planning Department of Mariposa County. They are outright lying. This may be useful to Jerry Cox’s case. Please email me.
Hi.
In Germany we have currently a large debate about the permissibility of circumcision by Muslims and Jews.
Hundreds of scientists have turned in a letter to the Chancellor, asking children to forbid circumcision.
Circumcision is definitely more disadvantages than advantages!
These arguments can also be useful for your work!
Here is the letter:
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/inland/offener-brief-zur-beschneidung-religionsfreiheit-kann-kein-freibrief-fuer-gewalt-sein-11827590.html
(Please translate him by internet)
Sincerely,
Thomas Friedrich
No court system or service should have the right to remove children from a home of a peaceful, caring, parent based on corrupt rulings made by the party with the most money. Facts and evidence are not enough in Family Law. That is a tragedy. These actions affect the children first and most severely. Our children are worth more than that. Some of us pay the ultimate price. Get the corruption out of our family court system.
It has driven me crazy for YEARS that the 'received wisdom" is only men are abusers. NOT SO!!