DSK Sues for False Allegations. – It’s About Time Somebody Did!
By Eric Ross, Ph.D.
The international financier Dominique Strauss-Kahn, known as DSK, seeks damages for his arrest, which included jail time at New York’s Rikers Island Prison and house arrest, for losing his job as managing director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and for harm to his reputation causing him to drop out of the race for Presidency of France. His countersuit seeks at least $1 million in damages plus an undetermined amount of punitive damages. [Fn-1]
Nafissatou Diallo, his accuser, a single mother who immigrated from Guinea, has not worked since the incident a year ago, claiming now “a shoulder injury,” which she allegedly sustained during the encounter with Strauss-Kahn, said one of her lawyers, Douglas Wigdor.[Fn-1]
The case is a sad commentary on the misandric legal culture in the English-speaking world, where a woman, who in her allegations stated that she had performed fellatio on him, accused DSK of a “rape”. With prima facie evidence of absence of any disagreement between the two, how did fellatio qualify as “rape” in the first place? After all, the former US President Bill Clinton did not even consider fellatio he was regularly getting from an underage White House intern, “sex!”
A year ago, on May 14, 2011, Dominique Strauss-Kahn was arrested and charged with the sexual assault and attempted rape of 32-year-old Nafissatou Diallo, a housekeeper at the Sofitel New York Hotel in Manhattan. NYPD detectives took him off his Paris-bound flight at New York City’s John F. Kennedy International Airport just minutes before the takeoff. The U.S. State Department informed Strauss Kahn that his diplomatic immunity did not apply to this case.
He was arrested on the spot, handcuffed, paraded in front of the assembled TV cameras, and was later charged on several counts of sexual assault and unlawful imprisonment. A chorus of TV talking heads was shaming him, feminist legal commentators having a Schadenfreude fest, demanding he be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Applying a “reasonable woman standard,” the man deserved a conviction of rape and sexual assault on the account of his marital infidelity in the instant case, as well as having an alleged “history” of it.
Strauss-Kahn was accused of a litany of felony charges — two of criminal sexual acts of forcing the housekeeper to perform oral sex on him, one of attempted rape and one of sexual abuse — plus three misdemeanor offences, including unlawful imprisonment.
The costs of legal defense against such allegations are enormous. Just two weeks after his arrest, he UK Telegraph put the total cost of paying for his legal defense by then at $3 million, plus the $1 million cash bail backed by a $5 million bond. [Fn-2
The accuser, Nafissatou Diallo, was very believable and extremely emotional, describing terrible abuse she suffered at the hands of DSK, shedding tears, and making the special crimes’ unit female detectives enraged with DSK, yet… every time giving new and mutually contradictory details of her “terrible ordeal” at the hands of the alleged abuser.
Based on the recording of Nafissatou Diallo’s phone conversations with her boyfriend, then in detention in an INS jail, she apparently had a vision of a large pot of gold at the end of her legal skirmish with DSK.
Apparently, so did the accusers in other similar cases: the Kobe Bryant’s accuser, whose knickers bore traces of fresh semen of other men, or the accuser of the Duke University Lacrosse Team. Interestingly, the Duke university accuser was arrested in 2010 on charges of attempted murder, first-degree arson, assault and battery, identity theft, communicating threats, damage to property, resisting an officer and misdemeanor child abuse, and in late 2011 found competent to stand charges to the stabbing murder of her boyfriend. [Fn-3.a-b] In the US, no such evidence is relevant, when the women sais she was “raped.” Throughout these trials, a certain undeniable pattern emerged, with money, and false allegations as means of getting it, being key.
“Nothing changes one very important fact, namely, that Dominique Strauss-Kahn violently sexually assaulted the victim inside of that hotel room at the Sofitel,” said her lawyer even despite irreconcilable contradictions in her accusations. “Violently?”, “sexually assaulted?” – Really? Is it a “fact?”
We simply may not, cannot have false allegations of rape in America, because our most esteemed legal scholars, such as Katharine A. MacKinnon, have told our lawmakers “any heterosexual sex is rape of a woman.” So, evidence does not count, as long as the woman says it is rape… unless the accused can assemble a legal dream team, that would circumvent the legal hurdles of somehow introducing the evidence.
It’s interesting how well some immigrants to the US, legal and illegal, learn to take advantage of the politically-correct “New Speak” of the Violence Against Women Act, even before entering the country. American “feminist jurisprudence” in general, and VAWA in particular, have made the meaning of such heinous crime as “rape”, anything the woman wishes. If you are a woman, come to America, it is always an open season here on men of means, and there are scores of righteous lawyers, who will show you the way to riches (and attempt to siphon the men’s worth into their own pockets in the process.)
Diallo told investigators a compelling and detailed story of being gang-raped by soldiers in Guinea — a shocking story, which she fabricated in its entirety. She even told a story of genital mutilation, another hokum. She struck all the chords on the feminists’ violin, but she got rather confused about her inconsistent lies. She claimed to have only one phone, while paying hundreds of dollars a month to five phone companies, as well as paying individuals, known felons, depositing almost $100,000 into her bank savings account over the previous two years. Evidence developed suggesting she routinely provided extra “services” to hotel guests as means to supplement her pay. [Fn-4]
She told her lies with great emotion, precision, and conviction – with tears, with halting speech and trembling voice. She hid her face down in her hands, she spoke of the number and nature of her attackers. She pointed at scars on her body that were supposedly from the attack. She told a heart-breaking story of her 2-year old daughter whom the soldiers pulled out of her arms and threw on the ground, and how the child witnessed the “abuse.” Except all of it was an act and none of it ever happened, as she later had to admit. [Fn-5]
Meanwhile, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the front-running candidate for President of France, faced 25 years in prison for seven criminal counts, including attempted rape and was in prison or under house arrest.
Forbes estimated that combined worth of DSK and his wife was at more than $100 million. DSK, the diminutive of statue “rapist” must have been rather adventurous (or off-the-scale Masochistic) to trust (or more appropriately “to thrust” – remember we are talking an alleged “rape” here? ) his manhood into a full set of razor sharp teeth in the mouth of Ms. Nafissatou Diallo, a rather large woman. What a sick rapist, indeed!
Given his high post of the head of the IMF and his leadership in the Socialist party of France, and being a leading candidate for the 2012 French Presidency, it’s rather unlikely he’d be even inclined to so “rape” the underprivileged maiden, unless she fully cooperated. Although France invented the Guillotine, it is doubtful that its front-running Presidential candidate would so risk Presidential penis, vitally important to the prestige of the country and his personal wellbeing.
Unfortunately, there are plenty of enterprising potential “victims of rape” scouting the American landscape for deep-pocketed targets, but it is only men with truly large monetary resources, such as DSK, who can successfully legally defend themselves against these vultures. DSK, the Former Chief of the International Monetary Fund, who successfully defended himself against these ridiculously false allegations, is one such example. Meanwhile, the false “victims,” such as in the DSK case, are aided and abetted all the way by the scores of unscrupulous lawyers and prosecutors, in search of c0ld cash and political capital.
Culturally, DSK is not an American man. He is not resigned to being emasculated and forced into settlement; he is probably infuriated with the shakedown and the continued barrage of false allegations, as Nafissatou Diallo is now perusing the case in the civil court with its low standard of proof. All she needs is to gain sympathy of a judge, by shedding a tear or describing her “injuries.” A consummate actress, who cries convincingly, she is using the American legal system to get her pot of gold one way or another.
—————————–
Footnotes:
(Reuters) – Former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn has filed a $1 million countersuit against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault, costing him his job and any chance of being elected president of France. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/15/us-strausskahn-idUSBRE84E1H420120515
Fn-2: The Tricky Task of Estimating DSK’s Costs http://www.theatlanticwire.com/global/2011/06/dsk-spending-rape-case-defense/38359/
Fn-3.a: Attempted (Arson) Murder charges for Duke Accuser:
http://www.thetimesnews.com/news/duke-31774-accuser-durham.html
Fn-3.b: Duke lacrosse accuser charged with murder in boyfriend’s stabbing:
Fn-4: Jim Dwyer, William K. Rashbaum and John Eligon (June 30, 2011). “Strauss-Kahn Prosecution Said to Be Near Collapse” NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/01/nyregion/strauss-kahn-case-seen-as-in-jeopardy.html?pagewanted=1&hp
Fn-5: With False Tale About Gang Rape, Strauss-Kahn Case Crumbles
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/24/nyregion/housekeepers-false-tale-undid-strauss-kahn-case.html
FALSE ALLEGATIONS
http://ncfm.org/2009/01/issues/false-accusations/
It is also part of the American pop-culture to have a court of law "resolve" issues which are essentially political and/or cultural. The Congress often washes their hands off such controversial issues because they have their careers on the line, while the Supreme Court Judges are appointed for life and, thus, have nothing to loose.
But unless a political issue, which involves the fundamental interests of men, receives significant organized political support, we can't in all seriousness expect some "fair-minded" judge to stick his neck out to do our bidding for us. The bottom line is grow the ranks, and organize.
Cheers for that Eric . Cheers for that my friend !!
Im redy !
A law suit lacking specificity would be summarily dismissed. The misandric culture in the US (and under its influence — the whole English-speaking world — the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and to a lesser degree Ireland) has been at least 76 years in the making, and culminated in many laws, federal and state, that deliberately present an even playing field when the gender of the parties is a factor. What I am saying is that you cannot sue a "culture". You can only sue specific violations of law. The people, whom you would so sue, will turn around and say, "I was just following the law."
The best venue to "judge" the misandric US culture is cultural venue, such as NCFM.ORG, or newspapers which have the guts to address the issue.
I am afraid, the only one who may be sued here is the chamber maid… perhaps anyone in the DA office, if they, indeed, violated any procedural protections. Thus far, DSK is suing only the maid. Perhaps it would give some newspapers, at least in France, to have hard look at the misandry of the US laws.
My typing is ahead of my thinking. What I meant above was "an un-even playing field, deliberately slanted in favor of women to compensate for "inequities" alleged by MacDworkinites," when I accidentally typed "deliberately present an even playing field…" Clearly, it should read "uneven."
hmm, a class action lawsuit against the US government on behalf of all men….
You know, there could be money in that for an enterprising lawyer.
It's too bad it's not a class action lawsuit against the state and the nation so all aggrieved males could join in a lawsuit against false accusations made and prosecuted under cover/color of law. That's what's really needed to go after the gender feminist hate movement, and their ilk, that are masquerading under cover/color of law. There are far too many police, prosecutors, and judges just being "good soldiers" in the gender feminized legal system's WAR AGAINST MEN. It's time to draw a line in the sand on all the vile people who support all these false accusation-hate crimes going on under cover/color of law.
I hope he wins !! I realy do !! Finaly some guy with balls !!
He should also sue publications such as Paris Match for writing articles presuming his guilt before the case against him, ridiculous even before the details came out, were published. The woman was a chambermaid who claimed that she had accidentally gone to an occupied room, after midnight, walking in on a man of previous good character to find him naked. He then took it into his head to rape her. Some plausible explanation of how she "accidentally" ended up in his room would have been appropriate before any arrests were made would have been appropriate.
it is about money not balls.
She is such a liar ! She change her story 5 times ,it took her 1 hour to call 911 .She lied being gang raped in Guinea. Ya ,he is going to rape 200 pounds women , I just dont see it !! If I had his money I would sue the NYPD too ,I would hire the best lawyers and go to 60 Minutes and CNN !! He is a very rich man ,so what if he spends a few millions more . Money is not everything. It's WAR !!!